Example report

Piazza Maggiore 6, Bologna (BO)

44.493858, 11.341415Point confirmed on

18 public databases read on this point

  • TerraOverview summary our reading, produced by published rules (v1.7.0)
  • According to the source the original value, quoted unchanged

Example report for a public building: Palazzo d’Accursio, the seat of the Municipality of Bologna. It is produced now from the same sources and the same rules as an ordered report; it is linked to no order and has no PDF version.

Search your address The same report, for the point you confirm.

How to read this report

  • Each card opens with the question that source can answer, and right under it the answer in one line.
  • The source’s value is quoted word for word on white; TerraOverview’s reading, which is ours, sits on sand and is always labelled.
  • Where a source has no data for the point the card says so: no data is not the absence of risk.

= TerraOverview interpretation (sand ground, dashed border) = value published by the source, unchanged (white ground, solid border)

At a glance

TerraOverview summary Of 15 categories: 3 with nothing flagged at the point, 5 with a flag to read, 1 climate scenario, 1 context value, 5 not available.

  • 5readings to go throughGround motion · Seismic · Observed earthquakes (seismic history) · Contaminated sites · Air quality
  • 3categories with nothing reported on the pointFlood · Landslide · Wildfire
  • 1climate scenarioClimate projections
  • 1context measurementSoil consumption
  • 5categories with no dataRecorded landslides (IFFI) · Shoreline change (erosion and advance) · Sinkholes · Radon · Industrial sites (European register)

What to know about this point

The categories where a source reports something on the point, the most relevant first by our rules. Each entry opens its card, where the source’s own value is quoted in full.

  1. Observed earthquakes (seismic history) Significant flag

    Strongest intensity observed within 5 km: 8 or above (ruinous effects)

    An intensity is assessed on a settlement, over a set of buildings: within one village the effects vary with the ground and with how the houses are built.

    Observations weaker than 4 — «felt», «not felt» — stay in the database and are not listed here.

    According to the source INGV 2022

  2. Ground motion Flag present

    Vertical ground motion: subsidence measured

    The ground has gone down.

    A change beyond twice the measurement uncertainty, on the mean of the 100 m cell that contains the point, measured from satellites.

    According to the source Copernicus EGMS 2026

  3. Seismic Flag present

    Baseline seismic hazard: medium-high

    Band 2 of 4: strong earthquakes are possible.

    Reference acceleration 0.15–0.25 g, at the nearest node of the INGV grid.

    According to the source INGV 2004

  4. Contaminated sites Flag present

    Remediation procedure within 250 m: site found not contaminated

    The procedure closed without establishing contamination, or with values below the legal thresholds.

    The procedure concerns a site recorded in this area within the 250 m of accuracy ISPRA declares, not the queried point. Data as of 31/12/2021.

    According to the source ISPRA MOSAICO 2021

  5. Air quality Flag present

    Assessment of the zone: at least one limit or target value exceeded

    In the reference year at least one limit or target value set to protect human health was exceeded.

    The exceedance is established for the zone, the unit in which the law verifies the limits, and it obliges the Region to adopt an air quality plan.

    According to the source EEA 2025

Every category in one table

The “TerraOverview summary” column is our reading, produced by published rules (v1.7.0). It is not a judgement of the source. The source’s data is quoted word for word in the next column, and in full in the cards.

CategoryTerraOverview summaryAccording to the sourcePrecision
Flood Nothing flaggedno zone flagged by the source at the pointISPRA IdroGEO 2020no perimeter within 250 m see all25 m
Landslide Nothing flaggedno zone flagged by the source at the pointISPRA IdroGEO 2024no perimeter within 250 m see all25 m
Recorded landslides (IFFI) Not availableno data published by the source for this areaISPRA 2019no data for this area see all—
Shoreline change (erosion and advance) Not availableno data published by the source for this areaISPRA 2021no data for this area see all—
Ground motion Flag presentground subsidence measured (more than twice the measurement uncertainty)Copernicus EGMS 2026mean_velocity U -2.1 mm/year see all100 m
Sinkholes Not availableno data published by the source for this areaISPRA 2019no data for this area see all—
Seismic Flag presentmedium-high baseline seismic hazard (band 2 of 4: reference acceleration 0.15–0.25 g)INGV 2004ag 0.1670 g see all≈ 2.2 km (grid node)
Observed earthquakes (seismic history) Significant flagearthquakes with ruinous effects observed in a locality within 5 km of the pointINGV 2022Bologna see all≈ 5 km
Wildfire Nothing flaggedno zone flagged by the source at the pointEFFIS 2026no perimeter within 250 m see all250 m
Radon Not availableno data published by the source for this areaAree prioritarie radon 2026no data for this area see all—
Contaminated sites Flag presentwithin the accuracy radius of a procedure on a site found not contaminatedISPRA MOSAICO 2021Non contaminato see all250 m (position declared by the source)
Industrial sites (European register) Not availableno data published by the source for this areaEEA 2025no data for this area see all—
Air quality Flag presentzone exceeding at least one health limit or target valueEEA 20252025 · O3 46/25 days (Days in exceedance averaged over 3 calendar years) see all≈ 20 km (zone)
Soil consumption Context valuesoil consumed around the point, measured on the ISPRA mapISPRA 2025Computed by TerraOverview: soil consumed 98.7% within 100 m see all10 m
Climate projections Scenariolow emissions scenario (SSP1-2.6); high emissions scenario (SSP3-7.0)CMCC 2025Computed by TerraOverview: mean temperature +1.6 °C / mean temperature +1.8 °C see all≈ 5.5 km (grid cell)

= TerraOverview interpretation (sand ground, dashed border) = value published by the source, unchanged (white ground, solid border)

“Precision” is the spatial scale of the value: the larger it is, the more the value describes an area rather than the exact point.

Map

Select one or more indicators to display their map layers.

Map layers
Confirmed point Rendering by TerraOverview from the source’s data; the colours are ours.

The natural hazards of the point

What the official maps say about the ground, the water and the shaking at this point.

Is this area mapped as liable to flooding?Flood · Flood hazard · ISPRA IdroGEO

Nothing flaggedNo zone flagged by the source at the point.No zone flaggedPrecision: 25 mAccording to the source: ISPRA IdroGEO 2020no perimeter within 250 m

TerraOverview summary

Nothing flagged

The source covers the area and flags nothing at the point. It is not a low class: it is the absence of a flagged zone.

According to the source — ISPRA IdroGEO (2020)

The point does not fall inside any area mapped by source ISPRA IdroGEO — pericolosità idraulica (mosaicatura nazionale). No mapped perimeter within 250 m.

Notes on this source
  • The source covers this area and mapped no zone here; no perimeter within 250 m.
  • Attribution: ISPRA - Mosaicatura delle aree a pericolosità idraulica (v.5.0 2020) https://idrogeo.isprambiente.it
  • How the coverage of this source is established

Is this area mapped as landslide-prone?Landslide · Landslide hazard PAI · ISPRA IdroGEO

Nothing flaggedNo zone flagged by the source at the point.No zone flaggedPrecision: 25 mAccording to the source: ISPRA IdroGEO 2024no perimeter within 250 m

TerraOverview summary

Nothing flagged

The source covers the area and flags nothing at the point. It is not a low class: it is the absence of a flagged zone.

According to the source — ISPRA IdroGEO (2024)

The point does not fall inside any area mapped by source ISPRA IdroGEO — pericolosità da frana PAI (mosaicatura nazionale v.5.0 2024). No mapped perimeter within 250 m.

Notes on this source
  • The source covers this area and mapped no zone here; no perimeter within 250 m.
  • Attribution: ISPRA - Mosaicatura nazionale delle aree a pericolosità da frana PAI (v. 5.0 2024) Piattaforma IdroGEO
  • How the coverage of this source is established

Is the ground here sinking or rising?Ground motion · EGMS · Copernicus

Flag presentGround subsidence measured (more than twice the measurement uncertainty).Value at the pointPrecision: 100 mAccording to the source: Copernicus EGMS 2026mean_velocity U -2.1 mm/year

TerraOverview summary

Flag present

TerraOverview interpretation

Vertical ground motion: subsidence measured

The ground has gone down.

A change beyond twice the measurement uncertainty, on the mean of the 100 m cell that contains the point, measured from satellites.

What it means: by how many millimetres a year the ground moved on average over the period the satellites measured: it does not say why it moves, nor whether it will continue.

Note: it is the average of a 100 m cell: a single building can move differently. The threshold, twice the measurement uncertainty, is TerraOverview’s, not the source’s. The risk to a building also depends on how it is built: it is not provided by this source and TerraOverview does not compute it.

According to the source — Copernicus EGMS (2026)

mean_velocity U -2.1 mm/year · mean_velocity_std 0.0 · mean_velocity E 1.2 mm/year · mean_velocity_std 0.0 · 2020–2024 · E4427950 N2376850

The point falls inside the source’s area or cell.

Notes on this source
  • In the 100 metre cell that contains the point, EGMS reports a negative vertical mean velocity more than twice the uncertainty, that is the larger of the standard deviation published for the cell and the 0.7 mm/year EGMS states as the product specification: over the period measured the ground subsided on average. The threshold is TerraOverview’s choice, not the source’s.
  • It is the average of the 100 metre cell that contains the point, measured by the Sentinel-1 radar satellites over the period shown: a single building can move differently from the cell's average, and the product's geolocation is better than 10 metres. The point is on the edge of the cell: the neighbouring cell may report a different value.
  • Attribution: Contains modified Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information (European Ground Motion Service, Ortho). Values resampled into map tiles and classified by TerraOverview. The European Union does not endorse TerraOverview.
  • How the coverage of this source is established

What shaking is expected here?Seismic · Seismic hazard MPS04 · INGV

Flag presentMedium-high baseline seismic hazard (band 2 of 4: reference acceleration 0.15–0.25 g).Value at the pointPrecision: ≈ 2.2 km (grid node)According to the source: INGV 2004ag 0.1670 g

TerraOverview summary

Flag present

TerraOverview interpretation

Baseline seismic hazard: medium-high

Band 2 of 4: strong earthquakes are possible.

Reference acceleration 0.15–0.25 g, at the nearest node of the INGV grid.

What it means: the band tells how strongly the ground is expected to shake, not the damage that would follow. The value has a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years, is computed for rigid ground (without the amplification of the local soil) and refers to the nearest INGV grid node.

Note: this is not the municipality’s seismic zone, which the Region assigns. Seismic risk also accounts for the vulnerability of buildings and the people and property exposed: it is not provided by this source and TerraOverview does not compute it.

According to the source — INGV (2004)

ag 0.1670 g · 16perc 0.1469 · 84perc 0.1744 · id 104350

The point falls inside the source’s area or cell.

How to read this format

"ag" is the peak horizontal ground acceleration at the grid node, with a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. "16perc" and "84perc" are the 16th and 84th percentiles of the same estimate — how uncertain the model is around "ag" — and they are the column names of the INGV file. "id" identifies the grid node.

Notes on this source
  • At the nearest grid node, INGV computes a peak horizontal acceleration between 0.15 g and 0.25 g with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years: the second of the four intervals defined by OPCM 3519/2006. The value is for rigid ground and excludes local amplification; it is not the municipality’s seismic zone, which the Region assigns by its own procedure and with a tolerance of 0.025 g.
  • The value is the one INGV computed at the nearest grid node, on a mesh of about 2230 metres, and refers to rigid ground (Vs30 > 800 m/s) on level topography. Local amplification by soil and landform is not included.
  • Attribution: Stucchi M., Meletti C., Montaldo V., Akinci A., Faccioli E., Gasperini P., Malagnini L., Valensise G. (2004). Pericolosità sismica di riferimento per il territorio nazionale MPS04. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). https://doi.org/10.13127/sh/mps04/ag
  • How the coverage of this source is established

Which earthquakes were felt here?Observed earthquakes (seismic history) · DBMI15 · INGV

Significant flagEarthquakes with ruinous effects observed in a locality within 5 km of the point.Value at the pointPrecision: ≈ 5 kmAccording to the source: INGV 2022Bologna

TerraOverview summary

Significant flag

TerraOverview interpretation

Strongest intensity observed within 5 km: 8 or above (ruinous effects)

An intensity is assessed on a settlement, over a set of buildings: within one village the effects vary with the ground and with how the houses are built.

Observations weaker than 4 — «felt», «not felt» — stay in the database and are not listed here.

The point also falls in: earthquakes with damage to buildings observed in a locality within 5 km of the point; earthquakes felt with slight effects in a locality within 5 km of the point.

According to the source — INGV (2022)

earthquakes with ruinous effects observed in a locality within 5 km of the point

  1. Bologna · Bologna · IT_39296
    Earthquakes observed in this locality 106 in all
    • 1505 · Bolognese · intensità 8 · Mw 5.62
    • 1365 · Bologna · intensità 7-8 · Mw 5.33
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità 7 · Mw 5.22
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità 7
    • 1433 · Bologna · intensità 7 · Mw 4.63
    • 1796 · Emilia orientale · intensità 6-7 · Mw 5.45
    • 1780 · Bolognese · intensità 6-7 · Mw 5.06
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità 6-7
    • 1505 · Bolognese · intensità 6-7 · Mw 4.76
    • 1504 · Bolognese · intensità 6-7 · Mw 5.02
    • 1455 · Appennino bolognese · intensità 6-7 · Mw 4.4
    • 1399 · Appennino modenese · intensità 6-7 · Mw 5.1
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 5.05
    • 1909 · Emilia Romagna orientale · intensità 6 · Mw 5.36
    • 1889 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.53
    • 1881 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 5.22
    • 1881 · Appennino bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.77
    • 1834 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.71
    • 1801 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.9
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità 6
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità 6
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.7
    • 1688 · Romagna · intensità 6 · Mw 5.84
    • 1666 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.16
    • 1222 · Bresciano-Veronese · intensità 6 · Mw 5.68
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5-6 · Mw 5.13
    • 1869 · Appennino bolognese · intensità 5-6 · Mw 5.43
    • 1739 · Bologna · intensità 5-6 · Mw 4.4
    • 1661 · Appennino forlivese · intensità 5-6 · Mw 6.05
    • 1511 · Friuli-Slovenia · intensità 5-6 · Mw 6.32
    • 1505 · Bolognese · intensità 5-6 · Mw 4.16
    • 1505 · Bolognese · intensità 5-6 · Mw 4.4
    • 1505 · Bolognese · intensità 5-6 · Mw 4.4
    • 1323 · Bologna · intensità 5-6 · Mw 4.16
    • 1280 · Pianura emiliana · intensità 5-6 · Mw 4.4
    • 1174 · Val Padana · intensità 5-6 · Mw 3.93
    • 2003 · Appennino bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 5.24
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 5.36
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 5.1
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 4.61
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 4.73
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 5.2
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 5.29
    • 1920 · Garfagnana · intensità 5 · Mw 6.53
    • 1916 · Riminese · intensità 5 · Mw 5.82
    • 1916 · Riminese · intensità 5 · Mw 5.82
    • 1914 · Lucchesia · intensità 5 · Mw 5.63
    • 1881 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 4.59
    • 1879 · Appennino tosco-emiliano · intensità 5 · Mw 5.03
    • 1878 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 4.84
    • 1878 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 4.63
    • 1873 · Alpago Cansiglio · intensità 5 · Mw 6.29
    • 1850 · Modenese · intensità 5 · Mw 4.16
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità 5 · Mw 4.16
    • 1695 · Asolano · intensità 5 · Mw 6.4
    • 1408 · Bologna · intensità 5 · Mw 3.7
    • 1400 · Bologna · intensità 5 · Mw 4.16
    • 1400 · Bologna · intensità 5 · Mw 4.16
    • 1348 · Alpi Giulie · intensità 5 · Mw 6.63
    • 1996 · Pianura emiliana · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.38
    • 1976 · Friuli · intensità 4-5 · Mw 6.45
    • 1976 · Friuli · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.95
    • 1919 · Mugello · intensità 4-5 · Mw 6.38
    • 1918 · Appennino forlivese · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.96
    • 1875 · Costa romagnola · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.74
    • 1874 · Imolese · intensità 4-5 · Mw 4.96
    • 1873 · Appennino tosco-ligure · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.26
    • 1832 · Reggiano · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.51
    • 1813 · Romagna · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.28
    • 1806 · Reggiano · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.21
    • 1786 · Riminese · intensità 4-5 · Mw 5.66
    • 1728 · Bolognese · intensità 4-5 · Mw 4.4
    • 1542 · Mugello · intensità 4-5 · Mw 6.02
    • 2008 · Parmense · intensità 4 · Mw 5.36
    • 1999 · Frignano · intensità 4 · Mw 4.67
    • 1989 · Prealpi Vicentine · intensità 4 · Mw 4.85
    • 1987 · Reggiano · intensità 4 · Mw 4.71
    • 1983 · Parmense · intensità 4 · Mw 5.04
    • 1978 · Romagna · intensità 4 · Mw 4.61
    • 1971 · Parmense · intensità 4 · Mw 5.51
    • 1967 · Emilia Romagna orientale · intensità 4 · Mw 5.05
    • 1930 · Appennino tosco-emiliano · intensità 4 · Mw 3.97
    • 1930 · Appennino tosco-emiliano · intensità 4 · Mw 4.21
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 4 · Mw 4.72
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 4 · Mw 4.82
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 4 · Mw 4.54
    • 1929 · Imolese · intensità 4 · Mw 4.57
    • 1898 · Parmense · intensità 4 · Mw 5.37
    • 1895 · Fiorentino · intensità 4 · Mw 5.5
    • 1885 · Pianura Padana · intensità 4 · Mw 5.01
    • 1878 · Bolognese · intensità 4 · Mw 4.52
    • 1878 · Tossignano · intensità 4 · Mw 4.53
    • 1864 · Mugello · intensità 4 · Mw 5.11
    • 1861 · Romagna · intensità 4 · Mw 5.13
    • 1834 · Val di Taro-Lunigiana · intensità 4 · Mw 5.96
    • 1830 · Alto Reno · intensità 4 · Mw 4.53
    • 1811 · Modenese-Reggiano · intensità 4 · Mw 5.13
    • 1810 · Pianura emiliana · intensità 4 · Mw 5.06
    • 1781 · Faentino · intensità 4 · Mw 6.12
    • 1780 · Forlivese · intensità 4 · Mw 3.93
    • 1727 · Mugello · intensità 4 · Mw 4.93
    • 1725 · Appennino tosco-emiliano · intensità 4 · Mw 5.67
    • 1661 · Modenese · intensità 4 · Mw 4.86
    • 1624 · Argenta · intensità 4 · Mw 5.43
    • 1570 · Ferrarese · intensità 4 · Mw 5.44
    • 1536 · Appennino settentrionale · intensità 4 · Mw 5.12

The point falls inside the source’s area or cell.

earthquakes with damage to buildings observed in a locality within 5 km of the point

  1. Madonna di San Luca · Bologna · IT_71838
    Earthquakes observed in this locality 7 in all
    • 1881 · Bolognese · intensità D · Mw 5.22
    • 1881 · Appennino bolognese · intensità D · Mw 4.77
    • 1834 · Bolognese · intensità D · Mw 4.71
    • 1780 · Bolognese · intensità D · Mw 5.06
    • 1779 · Bolognese · intensità D
    • 1881 · Bolognese · intensità SD · Mw 4.59
    • 1889 · Bolognese · intensità HF · Mw 4.53
  2. Gaibola · Bologna · IT_39303
    Earthquakes observed in this locality 2 in all
    • 1834 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.71
    • 1801 · Bolognese · intensità 6 · Mw 4.9

The point falls inside the source’s area or cell.

earthquakes felt with slight effects in a locality within 5 km of the point

  1. Roncrio · Bologna · IT_72330
    Earthquakes observed in this locality 1 in all
    • 1929 · Bolognese · intensità 5-6 · Mw 5.05
  2. Casaglia · Bologna · IT_70197
    Earthquakes observed in this locality 1 in all
    • 1909 · Emilia Romagna orientale · intensità 5 · Mw 5.36
  3. Barbiano · Bologna · IT_39309
    Earthquakes observed in this locality 1 in all
    • 1909 · Emilia Romagna orientale · intensità 4 · Mw 5.36
  4. Monte Donato · Bologna · IT_70198
    Earthquakes observed in this locality 1 in all
    • 1909 · Emilia Romagna orientale · intensità 4 · Mw 5.36

The point falls inside the source’s area or cell.

Notes on this source
  • The Italian Macroseismic Database records, for a locality within 5 kilometres of the point — a distance TerraOverview chose — at least one earthquake of intensity 8 or above on the MCS scale, the degree at which the scale describes buildings ruined and partial collapses. An intensity is the effect observed in that settlement, not a measurement at the address, and it does not say whether or when it will happen again. The observations are listed strongest first, with the year, the epicentral area and the magnitude CPTI15 gives that earthquake. Those below intensity 4 are not listed.
  • The Italian Macroseismic Database records, for a locality within 5 kilometres of the point — a distance TerraOverview chose — at least one earthquake of intensity 6 or 7 on the MCS scale, the degrees at which the scale describes damage to buildings. An intensity is the effect observed in that settlement, not a measurement at the address, and it does not say whether or when it will happen again. The observations are listed strongest first, with the year, the epicentral area and the magnitude CPTI15 gives that earthquake. Those below intensity 4 are not listed.
  • The Italian Macroseismic Database records, for a locality within 5 kilometres of the point — a distance TerraOverview chose — earthquakes of intensity 4 or 5 on the MCS scale, the degrees at which the scale describes shaking felt with slight effects and no structural damage. It does not mean stronger earthquakes never happened: it means nothing stronger was recorded there. The observations are listed strongest first, with the year, the epicentral area and the magnitude CPTI15 gives that earthquake.
  • The locality is within 5 km of the point, a distance TerraOverview chose. A macroseismic intensity is the effect observed on that settlement, assessed over a set of buildings, not a measurement at one address: within one village the effects vary with the ground and with how the houses are built.
  • Attribution: Locati M., Camassi R., Rovida A., Ercolani E., Bernardini F., Castelli V., Caracciolo C.H., Tertulliani A., Rossi A., Azzaro R., D'Amico S., Antonucci A. (2022). Database Macrosismico Italiano (DBMI15), versione 4.0 [Data set]. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), https://doi.org/10.13127/dbmi/dbmi15.4, CC BY 4.0. Magnitudo da Rovida A., Locati M., Camassi R., Lolli B., Gasperini P., Antonucci A. (2022). Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani (CPTI15), versione 4.0 [Data set]. INGV, https://doi.org/10.13127/cpti/cpti15.4, e Rovida A., Locati M., Camassi R., Lolli B., Gasperini P. (2020). The Italian earthquake catalogue CPTI15. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(7), 2953-2984, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00818-y. Ogni località è rappresentata da TerraOverview come il cerchio di 5 km scelto da TerraOverview; sono elencate le osservazioni di intensità 4 o superiore
  • How the coverage of this source is established

Are there recorded burnt areas here?Wildfire · Burnt areas · EFFIS

Nothing flaggedNo zone flagged by the source at the point.No zone flaggedPrecision: 250 mAccording to the source: EFFIS 2026no perimeter within 250 m

TerraOverview summary

Nothing flagged

The source covers the area and flags nothing at the point. It is not a low class: it is the absence of a flagged zone.

According to the source — EFFIS (2026)

The point does not fall inside any area mapped by source EFFIS — burnt areas (Copernicus EMS). No mapped perimeter within 250 m.

Notes on this source
  • No fire recorded by EFFIS at this point since 2003; EFFIS maps events above about 30 ha, and since 2018 also smaller perimeters from Sentinel-2 imagery.
  • Attribution: © European Union, Copernicus Emergency Management Service — EFFIS
  • How the coverage of this source is established

Categories with no data for this point

The sources of these categories publish no value for this point. It does not mean the phenomenon is absent: it means nobody recorded or published it here.

  • Recorded landslides (IFFI)no data published by the source for this areaISPRA 2019
  • Sinkholesno data published by the source for this areaISPRA 2019
  • Radonno data published by the source for this areaAree prioritarie radon 2026

The land around it

What is recorded in the area around the point, from the shoreline to the plants to the air.

Are there remediation procedures nearby?Contaminated sites · MOSAICO · ISPRA

Flag presentWithin the accuracy radius of a procedure on a site found not contaminated.Value at the pointPrecision: 250 m (position declared by the source)According to the source: ISPRA MOSAICO 2021Non contaminato

TerraOverview summary

Flag present

TerraOverview interpretation

Remediation procedure within 250 m: site found not contaminated

The procedure closed without establishing contamination, or with values below the legal thresholds.

The procedure concerns a site recorded in this area within the 250 m of accuracy ISPRA declares, not the queried point. Data as of 31/12/2021.

What it means: it is a register of administrative procedures, not a map of the ground: it says a procedure was opened on a site in this area, and what state that site was in at the reference date.

Note: the position of the site carries 250 m of declared accuracy, so the procedure may concern neighbouring ground and not the ground at the point. The data stop at 31/12/2021: the competent authority named in the record is the source of its current state. The ground at the queried point has been examined by no procedure.

According to the source — ISPRA MOSAICO (2021)

Non contaminato · Concluso · «Altro - bonifica e/o MISP e/o MISO conclusa/e e certificata/e» · DM 471/99 · Città Metropolitana · 27/02/2001 · IT08BO037006020686

The point falls inside the source’s area or cell.

Notes on this source
  • MOSAICO records a remediation procedure on a site the source classifies as «Non contaminato» (not contaminated): the procedure was opened and closed without establishing contamination, or with values below the legal thresholds. The recorded position of the site, within the 250 metres of accuracy ISPRA declares, covers the queried point. It is an outcome concerning that site and that procedure at the reference date (31/12/2021), and says nothing about the ground at the queried point, which no procedure has examined.
  • The procedure is recorded with certainty; its position is not. ISPRA declares a positional accuracy of 250 metres for these coordinates, so the point falls inside the area within which the site is located, not on the site. The data are as of 31/12/2021 and a procedure may have moved since: the competent authority is the source of its current state.
  • Attribution: ISPRA - MOSAICO, banca dati nazionale sui siti contaminati (dati al 31/12/2021), CC BY-SA 4.0
  • How the coverage of this source is established

How is the air of this zone assessed?Air quality · Air quality zones · EEA

Flag presentZone exceeding at least one health limit or target value.Value at the pointPrecision: ≈ 20 km (zone)According to the source: EEA 20252025 · O3 46/25 days (Days in exceedance averaged over 3 calendar years)

TerraOverview summary

Flag present

TerraOverview interpretation

Assessment of the zone: at least one limit or target value exceeded

In the reference year at least one limit or target value set to protect human health was exceeded.

The exceedance is established for the zone, the unit in which the law verifies the limits, and it obliges the Region to adopt an air quality plan.

What it means: the assessment is of an air quality zone — tens of kilometres — which is the unit in which the law verifies compliance with the limit values, and it rests on the worst values its stations measured.

Note: it is not the air at this address: concentrations vary over tens of metres, the stations are few relative to the size of a zone, and no zoning can estimate it. The outcome is for the year stated.

According to the source — EEA (2025)

ZON.IT0890 · 2025 · O3 46/25 days (Days in exceedance averaged over 3 calendar years) · 12 pollutants assessed · 4 fixed stations

The point falls inside the source’s area or cell.

How to read this format

For each pollutant the source gives the worst value measured in the zone, then a slash, then the exceedance threshold for that metric. In brackets is the EEA’s own name for the metric, which may itself contain a slash: "NO2 53/40 µg/m³ (Annual mean / average)" therefore reads as an annual mean of 53 measured against a threshold of 40.

Notes on this source
  • In the air quality zone containing the point, at least one limit or target value set to protect human health was exceeded in the reference year. The exceedance is established for the zone, which is the unit in which the law verifies compliance: it obliges the Region to adopt an air quality plan. The values reported are the worst measured by the zone’s stations and are not the air quality at an address, which varies over tens of metres.
  • The assessment concerns the zone, which is the unit in which the law establishes compliance with limit values, and a zone can be tens of kilometres across. The values quoted are the worst measured by the zone's stations in 2025: they are not the air quality at an address, which varies between a street front and a courtyard behind it and which no zoning can estimate.
  • Attribution: European Environment Agency — Air Quality e-Reporting, zone assessment (underlying data reported by Italy through ISPRA)
  • How the coverage of this source is established

How much soil around here is sealed?Soil consumption · Soil consumption map · ISPRA

Context valueSoil consumed around the point, measured on the ISPRA map.Value at the pointPrecision: 10 mAccording to the source: ISPRA 2025Computed by TerraOverview: soil consumed 98.7% within 100 m

TerraOverview summary

Context value

TerraOverview interpretation: soil consumed around the point, measured on the ISPRA map

What it means: the share tells how much of the soil around the point is artificially covered: buildings, roads, yards, building sites. It matters for summer heat and for how much rain the ground can absorb.

Note: there is no threshold at which this share becomes a problem: it is a measurement, not a judgement. It says nothing about what may be built there: it is not a planning datum, and the rules on building are the municipality’s.

Computed by TerraOverview from data by ISPRA

111 - Edifici, fabbricati · soil consumed 98.7% within 100 m (310 pixels of 314) · soil consumed 97.6% within 500 m (7,662 pixels of 7,849)

Notes on this source
  • TerraOverview counts the 10 metre pixels of the national soil consumption map inside two circles around the confirmed point, one of 100 and one of 500 metres, and reports how much of the soil the map covers is under artificial cover — permanent or reversible, as ISPRA distinguishes them. The class of the pixel at the point is the source’s instead, in its own words. There is no threshold at which TerraOverview would call it too much: it is a measurement of the context, not a flag.
  • The map is photo-interpreted on 10 metre pixels: the boundary between consumed and unconsumed soil is precise to that size, and a small yard or canopy can fall in the neighbouring pixel. The share is a count of pixels, not a survey on the ground.
  • Attribution: ISPRA — Carta nazionale del consumo di suolo 2024 (risoluzione 10 m, v.7.0); elaborazione TerraOverview: percentuali di suolo consumato calcolate sui pixel della carta attorno al punto (CC BY 4.0)
  • How the coverage of this source is established

Categories with no data for this point

The sources of these categories publish no value for this point. It does not mean the phenomenon is absent: it means nobody recorded or published it here.

  • Shoreline change (erosion and advance)no data published by the source for this areaISPRA 2021
  • Industrial sites (European register)no data published by the source for this areaEEA 2025

The climate to come

A scenario, not a forecast: what the models project for this cell.

What climate is projected for this cell?Climate projections · Climate projections · CMCC

ScenarioLow emissions scenario (SSP1-2.6); high emissions scenario (SSP3-7.0).Value at the pointPrecision: ≈ 5.5 km (grid cell)According to the source: CMCC 2025Computed by TerraOverview: mean temperature +1.6 °C / mean temperature +1.8 °C

TerraOverview summary

Scenario

TerraOverview interpretation: low emissions scenario (SSP1-2.6), thirty years centred on 2050

TerraOverview interpretation: high emissions scenario (SSP3-7.0), thirty years centred on 2050

What it means: these are climate model projections: the mean change expected in the grid cell of about 5.5 km between the thirty years 2036-2065 and the 1985-2014 reference period, computed by TerraOverview from the CMCC daily fields. CMCC publishes the value of every single day; the four indicators are computed by us, and the heatwave definition is ours.

Note: this is a scenario, not a forecast: it describes how the climate would change if emissions followed that pathway, and the two pathways are shown together because which one to consider plausible is the reader’s judgement. The values come from a single climate model: there is no spread between models, so they do not say how far models disagree with each other. For precipitation and dry days this weighs more than elsewhere — at mid-century the two pathways are two tenths of a degree apart, less than a single model varies on its own, and the difference between the two scenarios on those two lines must not be read as an effect of the scenario. The value is for a cell 5.5 km across, not for the building.

Computed by TerraOverview from data by CMCC

2036-2065 against 1985-2014
Scenario SSP1-2.6Scenario SSP3-7.0
mean temperature+1.6 °C+1.8 °C
heatwave days+23 days/year+20 days/year
annual precipitation−3 mm/year+11 mm/year
consecutive dry days+1.1 days0 days
Notes on this source
  • SSP1-2.6 is the low emissions pathway among those the IPCC considered in its sixth assessment: it assumes global emissions fall rapidly and warming stays close to the limits of the Paris Agreement. The values are the mean change expected in the grid cell, about 5.5 km across, between the thirty years 2036-2065 and the 1985-2014 reference period, computed by TerraOverview from the daily values CMCC publishes. They come from a single climate model: there is no range between models, so these numbers do not say how far models disagree with each other, and for precipitation and dry days the difference between the two scenarios at mid-century is smaller than a single model varies on its own. This is a scenario, not a forecast, and it concerns a cell 5.5 km across, not the building.
  • SSP3-7.0 is a high emissions pathway, in which climate policy stays weak and international cooperation weakens; in the IPCC’s sixth assessment it is not the upper extreme, but it is the common reference for a world without additional policy. It is shown beside SSP1-2.6 and never alone: which of the two pathways to consider plausible is the reader’s judgement, and showing only one would be making it for them. The values are the mean change expected in the cell between 2036-2065 and 1985-2014, from a single climate model and therefore with no range between models beside them. This is a scenario, not a forecast.
  • This is a scenario, not a forecast: it describes how the climate would change if emissions followed that pathway, and pathways are assumptions. The value is that of a cell about 5.5 km across, not of the building. Heatwave days are counted against a fixed threshold taken from that same cell's 1985-2014 climate: in a warmer climate a threshold that does not move is crossed far more often, and that is what the increase measures.
  • Attribution: CMCC Foundation — SD-EQM_GCMs_IT, statistically downscaled CMIP6 projections over Italy (DOI 10.25424/cmcc-75s8-a308; reference paper Fedele, Reder & Mercogliano, Scientific Data 12, 910 (2025), DOI 10.1038/s41597-025-05270-8), CC BY 4.0. The values shown are climate indicators computed by TerraOverview from the dataset's daily fields and are not values the dataset publishes; CMCC accepts no liability for this use and does not endorse this service. Disclaimer, as the publisher gives it: "This dataset has been produced using a statistical methodology (Empirical Quantile Mapping) and should be used with caution, particularly for impact-oriented applications. The results are subject to inherent limitations related to the quality and representativeness of the training data (CERRA reanalysis), as well as to methodological assumptions. In particular, values exceeding the 99 percentile may be impacted by the extrapolation method used (Fedele et al., 2025). Users are advised to account for these limitations when interpreting and applying the dataset."
  • How the coverage of this source is established

Sources, versions and licences

18 sources, with version and licence
SourceDataset versionLicence
Aree prioritarie radon — art. 11 D.Lgs. 101/2020 (Regioni e Province autonome)2026.07.22IT-Atto-Ufficiale
CMCC — SD-EQM_GCMs_IT, statistically downscaled CMIP6 projections over Italy2026.09CC-BY-4.0
Copernicus EGMS — Ortho, vertical and east-west mean velocity (100 m)2020_2024EU-Copernicus-1159-2013
EEA — Air Quality e-Reporting, zone assessment2025CC-BY-4.0
EEA — Industrial Reporting (IED 2010/75/UE e E-PRTR 166/2006), mappa dei siti15.0-2025-12CC-BY-4.0
EFFIS — burnt areas (Copernicus EMS)2026-09-08CC-BY-4.0
INGV — DBMI15 v4.0, Database Macrosismico Italiano (con CPTI15 v4.0 per la magnitudo)4.0-2022.01CC-BY-4.0
INGV — MPS04, pericolosità sismica di riferimento (ag)2004.0-002CC-BY-4.0
ISPRA — Carta nazionale del consumo di suolo (10 m)2024CC-BY-4.0
ISPRA — Database Nazionale Sinkhole (sprofondamenti censiti)2026.09.19CC-BY-4.0
ISPRA — Inventario dei Fenomeni Franosi in Italia (IFFI, frane censite)2026.09.19CC-BY-SA-4.0 *
ISPRA — Linea di costa 2020 e dinamica costiera 2006–20202020-v2.2CC-BY-4.0
ISPRA IdroGEO — pericolosità da frana PAI (mosaicatura nazionale v.5.0 2024)5.0-2024CC-BY-4.0
ISPRA IdroGEO — pericolosità idraulica (mosaicatura nazionale)5.0-2020CC-BY-SA-4.0 *
ISPRA MOSAICO — procedimenti di bonifica (banca dati nazionale siti contaminati)2021.12.31CC-BY-SA-4.0 *
ISTAT — confini delle unità amministrative a fini statistici2026.01CC-BY-4.0
OpenStreetMap address index (Italy)2026-09-06ODbL-1.0 *
Protomaps basemap (OpenStreetMap)20260906ODbL-1.0 *

* Sources under a share-alike licence are marked: anyone redistributing material derived from them is held to the same conditions.

Method and limits

How to read the report, how coverage is established, notes and limitations.
  • The value is given in the language and the terms of the body that publishes it, without translation or rewording. Lines marked "Computed by TerraOverview" are not published by the source: they are computed from its data, by the method named beside them.
  • The TerraOverview summary is our own work, produced by published, versioned rules: the interpretation of each official class and the level of each category. It is not a judgement of the source and does not add up to a score.
  • Every source is in one of three states: a value at the point; an area covered, with no zone flagged at the point; no data for this area. The absence of a value is not a statement about the phenomenon, in either direction.
  • This document is for information: it is not a survey, it is not a certification and it is not a professional assessment of a place or a property.

Each value is reported in the language and the terms of the body that publishes it, untranslated and unrephrased: translating a source’s classification would change it. Below it, in smaller type, is what TerraOverview reads it as, in the language chosen here. The exception is any row marked “Computed by TerraOverview”: there the value is not published by the source but calculated from its data, by the method linked in the corresponding section.

Cartographic rendering produced by TerraOverview from the data of the source named, for the area around the confirmed point. It is not an official map of that body.

How coverage is established

The coverage of this source is not published by the source: TerraOverview derived it from the union of the mapped perimeters.

The source declares that it covers the countries participating in Copernicus, Italy included, but publishes a value only where it has a measurement: in areas of high relief, for instance, radar geometry prevents full coverage. TerraOverview reports this source where a measurement exists; where none exists it makes no statement, and in particular does not state that the ground is not moving.

This source is a register of administrative procedures, not a map of the territory. The source declares national scope and, in the same document, declares that the regional registers feeding it are uneven and that some regions transmitted nothing. TerraOverview reports this source where a procedure is recorded; anywhere else it says nothing at all, and in particular does not say that there is none.

The source declares that it covers the whole national territory. To decide whether a point falls within it TerraOverview uses the ISTAT administrative boundaries (CC BY 4.0), simplified to 50 metres: the extent is the source’s statement, the boundary it is tested against is not. Within fifty metres of a border or a coastline the answer can fall on the wrong side, and there the reading is the more cautious of the two.

This source is made of acts by different authorities: each Region or Autonomous Province classifies its own territory, and not all of them have done so yet. TerraOverview reports this source inside the territories of the authorities that have completed and published the classification, tested against the Istat administrative boundaries (CC BY 4.0); where the authority has not yet acted it makes no statement. The limit is the act’s, not the territory’s.

Notes and limitations

  • The data comes from the sources named beside each value. TerraOverview collects and organises it: it is not the body that produced it, and it does not alter classifications, units or terminology.
  • Sources update their datasets over time. Every value carries the dataset version and the date the source declares; for the current version, the original source governs.
  • The presence or absence of a value is not a certification, in either direction. Where a source publishes nothing for an area, the value does not exist in that dataset — it does not mean the phenomenon cannot occur.
  • TerraOverview readings are our own work, produced by published, versioned rules from the source’s classification. They are labelled as such wherever they appear.
  • The point this report refers to is the one confirmed on the map by whoever ordered it: the accuracy of that position is the responsibility of the person who confirmed it, and every value here applies to that point.
  • The content is for information. It is not a survey, it is not a certification and it is not a professional assessment of a place or a property.
  • For technical, planning, property or legal decisions, consult the official sources and, where needed, qualified professionals.
Technical details
Rules version
1.14.0
Summary levels
1.7.0
Dataset versions
cmcc-sdeqm-climate@2026.09, copernicus-egms-ortho@2020_2024, eea-air-quality-zones@2025, eea-ied-eprtr@15.0-2025-12, effis-burnt-areas@2026-09-08, ingv-dbmi15@4.0-2022.01, ingv-mps04-seismic-hazard@2004.0-002, ispra-consumo-suolo@2024, ispra-idrogeo-flood@5.0-2020, ispra-idrogeo-landslide@5.0-2024, ispra-iffi-landslide-inventory@2026.09.19, ispra-linea-di-costa@2020-v2.2, ispra-mosaico-contaminated-sites@2021.12.31, ispra-sinkhole@2026.09.19, radon-aree-prioritarie@2026.07.22
Attributions
Aree prioritarie radon individuate ai sensi dell'art. 11 del D.Lgs. 101/2020 da Regioni e Province autonome; confini comunali Istat (CC BY 4.0) · CMCC Foundation — SD-EQM_GCMs_IT, statistically downscaled CMIP6 projections over Italy (DOI 10.25424/cmcc-75s8-a308; reference paper Fedele, Reder & Mercogliano, Scientific Data 12, 910 (2025), DOI 10.1038/s41597-025-05270-8), CC BY 4.0. The values shown are climate indicators computed by TerraOverview from the dataset's daily fields and are not values the dataset publishes; CMCC accepts no liability for this use and does not endorse this service. Disclaimer, as the publisher gives it: "This dataset has been produced using a statistical methodology (Empirical Quantile Mapping) and should be used with caution, particularly for impact-oriented applications. The results are subject to inherent limitations related to the quality and representativeness of the training data (CERRA reanalysis), as well as to methodological assumptions. In particular, values exceeding the 99 percentile may be impacted by the extrapolation method used (Fedele et al., 2025). Users are advised to account for these limitations when interpreting and applying the dataset." · Contains modified Copernicus Land Monitoring Service information (European Ground Motion Service, Ortho). Values resampled into map tiles and classified by TerraOverview. The European Union does not endorse TerraOverview. · European Environment Agency — Air Quality e-Reporting, zone assessment (underlying data reported by Italy through ISPRA) · European Environment Agency — Industrial Reporting under the Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU and the E-PRTR Regulation (EC) No 166/2006, v15.0 (dicembre 2025), consultato il 23/09/2026, https://industry.eea.europa.eu/, CC BY 4.0; dati dichiarati dai gestori e trasmessi dall'Italia. Ogni sito è rappresentato da TerraOverview come il cerchio di 500 m scelto da TerraOverview · ISPRA - Dipartimento per il Servizio Geologico d'Italia, Database Nazionale Sinkhole (dati al 19/09/2026), CC BY 4.0; ogni record rappresentato da TerraOverview come il cerchio di 10 m dell'accuratezza posizionale dichiarata · ISPRA - MOSAICO, banca dati nazionale sui siti contaminati (dati al 31/12/2021), CC BY-SA 4.0 · ISPRA - Mosaicatura delle aree a pericolosità idraulica (v.5.0 2020) https://idrogeo.isprambiente.it · ISPRA - Mosaicatura nazionale delle aree a pericolosità da frana PAI (v. 5.0 2024) Piattaforma IdroGEO · ISPRA – Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale. Linea di costa 2020 (v2.2) e dinamica costiera 2006–2020, CC BY 4.0; tratti letti da TerraOverview entro una fascia di 250 m dalla linea · ISPRA – Regioni e Province Autonome. Inventario dei Fenomeni Franosi in Italia - IFFI. idrogeo.isprambiente.it (dati al 19/09/2026), CC BY-SA 4.0; frane censite come linea o come solo punto rappresentate da TerraOverview come la fascia di 25 m dell'accuratezza posizionale dichiarata; ogni record porta nel campo «attribuzione» la citazione della propria Regione o Provincia Autonoma, come la licenza la chiede · ISPRA — Carta nazionale del consumo di suolo 2024 (risoluzione 10 m, v.7.0); elaborazione TerraOverview: percentuali di suolo consumato calcolate sui pixel della carta attorno al punto (CC BY 4.0) · Istat, Confini delle unità amministrative a fini statistici · Locati M., Camassi R., Rovida A., Ercolani E., Bernardini F., Castelli V., Caracciolo C.H., Tertulliani A., Rossi A., Azzaro R., D'Amico S., Antonucci A. (2022). Database Macrosismico Italiano (DBMI15), versione 4.0 [Data set]. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), https://doi.org/10.13127/dbmi/dbmi15.4, CC BY 4.0. Magnitudo da Rovida A., Locati M., Camassi R., Lolli B., Gasperini P., Antonucci A. (2022). Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani (CPTI15), versione 4.0 [Data set]. INGV, https://doi.org/10.13127/cpti/cpti15.4, e Rovida A., Locati M., Camassi R., Lolli B., Gasperini P. (2020). The Italian earthquake catalogue CPTI15. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(7), 2953-2984, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00818-y. Ogni località è rappresentata da TerraOverview come il cerchio di 5 km scelto da TerraOverview; sono elencate le osservazioni di intensità 4 o superiore · Stucchi M., Meletti C., Montaldo V., Akinci A., Faccioli E., Gasperini P., Malagnini L., Valensise G. (2004). Pericolosità sismica di riferimento per il territorio nazionale MPS04. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). https://doi.org/10.13127/sh/mps04/ag · © European Union, Copernicus Emergency Management Service — EFFIS · © OpenStreetMap contributors · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Protomaps

Search your address